# 37 – Primer FIELds

### The conCERNed research of David LaPoint

This work is worth noting and making record of.

How it collides with the numbers **37** and **43** and the geometry archetypes I have been gathering as evidence of a design we are just beginning to comprehend, again.

### ‘IN THIS SIGN CONQUER’ the Great Pyramid and the Sacred Cut by Tons Brunés leads us to Nikola Tesla and the Philosopher’s Stone

### Calculating the electronic structure of graphene

Here is a comment I hope to share with Dave, acknowledging his intuition, and mine too.

David thanks for your work illustrating the hexagonal/graphene geometry.

kachina2012DOTwordpressDOTcom/

The above site *confirms your work* and shows how it is fundamental to what we can see and cannot see.

It clearly illustrates how far reaching the implications are of what you have presented.The hexagon geometry scaling outwards starts with 6 around 1 and the pattern is simple.

You just keep adding 6 hexagons to each successive ring ending up with hexagon rings following this pattern >> i.e. … the center 1 > 6 >12 >18 > 24Important to note the center plus the first three rings total ’37’.

Important to remind the reader that the mandala shown the greatest reverence in Buddhism is the Sri Yantra and it has ‘

43‘ triangles that are a fundamental part of its structure.The Sri Yantra (“holy instrument”) or Sri Chakra (“holy wheel”) is a yantra formed by nine interlocking triangles that surround and radiate out from the central (bindu) point, the junction point between the physical universe and its unmanifest source.

The result of 5 triangles pointing downward (Shakti energy) overlapping with 4 triangles pointing upward (Shiva energy).

9 triangles thus give birth to 43 smaller ones.

This next video continues to highlight the geometry that we can easily associate to the Seed/Flower/Fruit of Life and back again to the number

# 37

Truth ‘just is’ and eventually all the research takes us back to what ‘just is’.

NOW why should that be so surprising to find out that the Great Pyramid is a ‘time capsule’ still capable of delivering more AHAs?

Important to recall that the controversial first/second Pharaoh associated with the unification of North and South Egypt was Horus Aha or Hor Aha which means* Horus the Fighter!*

There has been some controversy about Hor-Aha. Some

^{[4]}believe him to be the same individual as the legendaryMenes and that he was the one to unify all of Egypt. Others claim he was the son of Narmer, the pharaoh who unified Egypt. Narmer and Menes may have been one pharaoh, referred to with more than one name. Regardless, considerable historical evidence from the period points to Narmer as the pharaoh who first unified Egypt (see Narmer Palette) and to Hor-Aha as his son and heir.

selah V

## Comments

thought you may like this – can you drop me your email via skype and / or call me please

Nice post, I found Feynmans quartic gluon coupling diagram interestingly resembles the swastika, have a look.

http://courses.washington.edu/phys55x/Physics%20558_lec3.htm

‘boing boing boing boing’

yes it does

thanks for the contribution

selah V

Aloha all, almost the end of 2014 and no recent news with PF? I just found this and have been studying magnetism interacting with sharks. I’d like to discuss this further but it seems that most involved haves just dropped off of the map.

papayaguy at hush mail daht kom.

Numers, numbers everything is numbers, if so consider 7,13,19. What number comes next in this series is not as important as how? And what it implies gives proof for the point of no return, specifically no reincarnation for the number enters the fourth dimension. What number is it?

you lost me at the following claim you made

“specifically no reincarnation for the number enters the fourth dimension”

Now instead of pretending to be a wise guy why don’t you share with us your numerical tale?

so what number is it?

extra marks given if you show your work pilgrim

selah V

hey wise guy

I would be more than happy to discuss ideas that would challenge your narrow minded POV.

Why don’t you muster up the courage, ewe and Doug, BLTs are being served and leave a comment on this blog here;

https://at37.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/applications-for-the-swastika/

I would be surprised if either you or Doug read that blog and have anything intelligent to offer, surprise me.

Punks like you going around pretending your science is not on a learning curve sound like preacher creatures with all of the answers.

Easy to prove that science has become a religion.

Would you being willing to take the swastika challenge?

cheers,

## Trackbacks

[…] https://at37.wordpress.com/2013/02/01/37-primer-fields-the-concerned-research-of-david-lapoint/ […]